Ensuring Safety in Delhi’s Coaching Centres: Supreme Court Steps In
In the wake of a tragic incident at Rau’s IAS coaching centre in Delhi’s Old Rajendra Nagar, where three aspiring civil servants lost their lives in a flooded basement, the Supreme Court has taken a significant step to address safety concerns in coaching centres across the city. On July 5, the Supreme Court initiated a suo motu case to investigate the safety compliance of these institutions, demonstrating the judiciary’s proactive role in safeguarding student welfare.
Tragic Incident Sparks Judicial Intervention
The unfortunate incident at Rau’s IAS has highlighted the pressing need for stringent safety measures in coaching centres, which cater to thousands of students pursuing their dreams of academic and professional success. The Supreme Court’s decision to take suo motu cognizance of this issue underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgent need for regulatory oversight.
Supreme Court’s Directive
The Bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, has issued a notice to the Union Ministry of Urban Affairs and the Delhi Government, seeking clarity on the existing safety norms and compliance mechanisms. This move is a critical step towards ensuring that coaching centres adhere to safety regulations and provide a secure environment for their students.
Delhi High Court’s Role
Prior to the Supreme Court’s intervention, the Delhi High Court had already taken steps to regulate the operation of coaching centres in the capital. In December 2023, the court issued directives mandating inspections and requiring all coaching centres to obtain a no-objection certificate (NOC) from the Fire Department. Additionally, the court has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the tragic deaths of the three aspirants, reflecting the seriousness of the situation.
Implications for Coaching Centres
The Supreme Court’s involvement in this matter sends a clear message to coaching centres operating without proper safety measures. Institutions must prioritize student safety and comply with all regulatory requirements to prevent such tragedies in the future. The court’s directive also emphasizes the importance of having an effective mechanism in place to monitor and enforce compliance.